When germ theory was first introduced to doctors, they weren’t just skeptical. They were offended to the point of hostility. The suggestion that infections in surgical patients could be caused by germs on the doctors’ hands was an absolute insult. Their hands were clean, obviously! They were medical professionals who knew how to wash their hands, and to insinuate otherwise was dire slander.
Nowadays, we know better. Not only do we know that germ theory is correct, but we know that scientists like Louis Pasteur weren’t insulting the doctors. To point out that you have microscopic bacteria on your hands that you couldn’t have known about isn’t an example of fightin’ words. It’s a fact of the universe, and it was offered up in the sincere hope that the knowledge would help people overcome it. Once we know that our hands have infectious diseases on them that we can’t see but that can nonetheless threaten a patient’s life, we can take steps to eliminate those germs and protect the patient. Having germs on your hands doesn’t make you an unclean wretch. Only refusing to take responsibility once you know the truth should mark you as an enemy of progress.
Of course, I say “nowadays we know better… with germs. Sadly, we’re doing the exact same thing today in another sphere. Replace “doctors” with “leaders” and replace “germs” with “unconscious bias, heuristics, and mental noise” and you have a good approximation of the state of leadership today.
All humans have these “mental germs.” It’s a fact of our evolution, our psychology. It’s not an insult to say that a human is susceptible to recency bias any more than it’s an insult to say that humans are susceptible to having germs on their hands. But like the doctors of the 19th Century, the leaders of the 21st tend to get awfully mad when you suggest it.
The point, of course, isn’t to offend. When I run a training course on the halo/horns effect, I’m not telling leaders: “You shouldn’t be a manager of people because you, specifically, keep making this stupid mistake, dummy.” I’m telling them specifically how to overcome a dilemma that every single human has. I’m telling the doctors how to get rid of the germs.
Some doctors, of course, were more concerned with their status as gentlemen than they were with the potential harm to patients. And some leaders are more concerned with their position than they are with effectively leading people. I feel your pain, Louis.
We all want to believe that our minds, in their natural state, are as unbiased and rational as the doctors believed their hands were clean. But true responsibility to those under your care requires that you acknowledge that they need active sterilization in ways that don’t occur to you naturally. If you shirk that responsibility, then I am saying that you shouldn’t be a leader. If those are fightin’ words, so be it. I’m fighting for the people who count on you.